Hello Karan Thapar: Talk Anything But With Facts And Sense

I have always failed to understand if a dog had a sense of understanding the different between the right and the wrong, it would have always been on a priority for him to choose the right master rather than any master who feeds him with regular bunch of milk and meat. Tragedy of life is that a dog is always loyal to the bone that his master keeps on offering him and in lieu keeps buying his loyalty. So the value of loyalty for a dog is the bone and the little bonding with his master that gradually develops irrespective of if the master is a murderer or a saint.

So Mr. Karan Thapar when you opened your article in Hinduustan Times today titled We have Yet to hear even a squeak from PM Modi with a line saying Has BJP taken leave of its senses? I started thinking about your past articles and wondered if any one has ever been able to impress. You always talk about something that is far away from facts. There is always no figures and reality in your articles. Another weakness of Mr. Karan Thapar is a misunderstanding that he always try to talk about PM or equivalent, nothing below that, and that makes him have a feeling of a high class person. Reality is that he has to be sensible in his writings in whatever chances now he gets like HT gives him only once a week chance. So he must talk more sensible, something that starts hitting on hearts and minds of the youth rather than writing negative and crib about something or the other.

The facts are far fearful than the reality that has come into light so far about the love jihad probably about which he is not aware and has cribbed about in his article.

Just enter into the shoes of the girl who has suffered the biggest shock of her life that probably will keep haunting and torturing her for her whole life.

So Mr. Karan Thapar before blaming Mr Modi just face the mirror and try coming out of the limitations of being loyal to someone or some party even he or it has done the worst to our country.

Karan Thapar: Please Stop Lousy Articles On HT Every Sunday

In one of his October posts on Sunday edition of Hindustan Times, Karan Thapar wrote of neglecting both Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi as PMs based on some baseless opinion. Every other Sunday his solo article being published in HT carries not much of significance in any sense these days. I am not sure whether HT is lacking good writers and stuff to fill their pages or KT (Karan Thapar) has stopped thinking and producing good material to post.

One thing good that HT does is sparing themselves out of it by putting a disclaimer that whatever is posted by Karan Thapar is solely his own opinion and HT has no role in that. This kind of disclaimers help in directing your love (or hatred) towards the article writer, depending on the stuff he produces based on which the readers get influenced or dragged away from the writer. Why I still keep reading his article is because I have seen his early days aggressive interviews he

used to conduct under "Devils Advocate" and other programs; and still dream that if not this Sunday, next Sunday he would definitely produce something useful.

But this keeps going week after week and I still keep my fingers crossed that if maybe next week he will certainly count his every week marks that are below expectations and probably would try to improve his next article with some substantial stuff.

If we take today's article - he is attacking NaMo on some baseless reasons while challenging his knowledge on China, World and India. There are few things to be considered by Karan Thapar before putting such stupid, baseless, senseless and satirical allegations on the knowledge of the most eligible Prime Ministerial Candidate as of today for the forthcoming elections in 2014. 

Hello Karan Thapar This Is About PM Of India Not Class Monitor

In today's Hindustan Times there is an article on P14 by Karan Thapar titled Neither Modi Nor Rahul Should Be PM. The article says that both these gentlemen Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi don't deserve to be the Prime Monister of India. And the basis for both rejections is just one incidence each. Narendra Modi is being rejected because he reacted hurriedly to the Pakistani journalist's tweet remarking Indian Prime Minister as Village Woman. Rajiv Gandhi has been rejected on the basis of his outburst on Prime Minister regarding Ordinance Bill.

Mr Karan Thapar, I have been watching your programs since my childhood and really admired the way you used to interview politicians with crunching and grinding teeth and fully blown nostrils. These styles

used to fulfill the requirement of comedy shows those days that were not there. Now tell me how just on these just two silly mistakes made by the two gentlemen one each, how justified is it to reject them for the prime ministerial candidature. What it means that if any of the politician or even a non politician scores good marks in your one activity task by not getting prompted by a tweet without verifying it or blasting openly on any of the Ordinance Bills being undertaken by Manmohan Singh, he or she will become eligible to be the next Prime Minister of India?

One more thing comes into my mind that we can carry out this assessment now onward on daily basis. Everyday we assess Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi on their previous day's activities and declare if they are eligible to be the Prime Minister on the basis of that day's score. And the cumulative score will decide their candidature at the end. 

We will name this assessment as KTA - Karan Thapar Assessment. Wondering what will happen if Narendra Modi and Rahul Gandhi tie in heir scores - Will both become Prime Minister?

I have a request to you Mr Thapar. Since you are a very senior journalist and media celebrity, please don't write such lengthy articles in Hindustan Times or elsewhere just to fill the space without keeping in mind your reputation and earlier achievements. Even these type of articles where you assess the two gentlemen for Prime Ministerial candidature - assess them on more grounded parameters like their achievements, contribution to country's progress, connect factor with public and many more that I can suggest you.